La paix est oblige avec Israel selont le Qur'an!!Lislame hijacker par Colonialisme

[dalandau]

La paix est oblige avec Israel selont le Qur'an!!Lislame hijacker par Colonialisme et le Wahhibisme

The real Islam has a common link to the Jews….
"The Koran announces a reestablishment of the House of Israel in the Land… and Allah said to the children of Israel: dwell securely in the Promised land…"
A comparative analysis of Koranic and Torah sources reveals an agreement on the point that the link existing between the children of Israel and the Land of Canaan depends directly on God Almighty's will, toward which we are asked to submit to Allah constituted the offspring of Jacob as heirs off the promised land. From King Feisal of Iraq to King Abdullah I of Trans-Jordan, many Islamic voices that had been pro-Jewish were silenced and the irrational hostility toward Zionism was introduced. Being against Jewish sovereignty over Palestine is denying the history of revelation and prophecy. The head of an Islamic council of scholars, Sheikh Abdul Palazzi, continues in this vein and notes that the Koran announces a reestablishment of the House of Israel in the Land before the last judgment, where is says: "and therefore we (Allah) said to the children of Israel, Dwell securely in the Promised land." And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd." (Koran 17-105)
Remember when Moses said to his people, "Oh my people, remember the presents that G-d gave to you when he appointed prophets from among you, and made you kings, and gave to you what he had never given to anyone else in the world (a clearly mapped out homeland in Israel). Enter then my people the holy land that God has commanded for you." Again, in the sections called Hobbling 15; Cow 44-116; Smoke 30, the Koran recognizes the particularity of Israel, with its unparalleled gifts, including the Promised Land. In the section called Table-23, the Koran insists that the Holy Land was given to Israel. In the section called Jonah 93, the Koran states that Allah settled the Jews there and in the section Cow 60,247, even rebukes Israel for not fighting hard enough for Her land.
Islam on Judaism…."The Koran recognizes the teachings of Jewish prophets and… the continued validity of the Torah…" The Koran, in section Table 48, recognizes the teachings of the Jewish prophets and even the validity of later sages and Rabbis. Other parts of the Koran recognize David's kingdom and his Psalms, and he is confirmed as divine viceroy and judge on earth (Zad 19,25;Cow 252). Abraham is called a true Muslim as are the prophets (who are also Rabbis), even though they kept the Sabbath and prayed in the direction of Jerusalem. (Kings I, 8: 30-42). ( Koranic sources include Imram 60, Pilgrimage 77 Cattle 162, Table 48, Cow 140 and 143, Greeks 5, Hobbling 31, Believers 76. )
Interestingly, just as Bahai, Christian etc... sources rely on Hebrew scriptures, so does the Koran, and specifically, it speaks of Israel's return to the land and to the holy city Jerusalem. (Bani Israel 8, 105). The Koran also demands that faithful Muslims help the Jews and their return to Zion. Finally, the Koran insists that there is continued validity to the book of the Jews (Jonah 38, Bee 45, 47, Cow 172, Table 52, Believers 56, etc). There are several sources in the Koran that recognize that there exist different religious rituals to reach God; especially the significance of good deeds, and the importance to God of love and forgiveness. (Sura 49, Inner rooms 13, Sura 109, The Heretics 6, Sura 5, Table 48, Sura 9-29, Sura Elchajrath 13-49.).
Another interesting fact, not known to many is that opting for Ishmael over Isaac satisfied the political need to assert Arab preeminence in the Muslim world. Substituting Ishmael at the binding of Isaac likewise satisfies a desire to negate the centrality of Jewish figures like Moses etc. By the way, Moses is the individual most cited in the Koran. The great orthodox Muslim scholar, Ata' Ibn As-Sa'ib, finally concluded after a lifetime of research that the sacrifice was indeed Isaac!!!! Other classic texts such as Ibn El-Arabi's Illuminations of Mecca (12 th century) which shows the importance of coexistence are suffocated by modern twisted Islam.
A Muslim cleric once said, "Ibrahim was granted Isaac with a divine promise, that Isaac would be granted Jacob…" (Abraham-Passia, page 42) Also is cited in the Koran: "When he had turned away from them and from those whom they worshipped besides God, we bestowed upon him Isaac and Jacob, and each one of them became a prophet. (Koran 19-49) Furthermore, the Koran states that these two were gifts granted to Abraham. "And we bestowed upon him Isaac, and as an additional gift, (a grandson): Jacob. And we made righteous men of every one of them." (Koran 21-72).
Palestinian Arabs have been offered a state many times,starting with plans during the British Mandate which the Arabs rejected.The United Nation partition plan of 1947 included a nation for Palestinians.They only had let Israel live in peace.Arabs rejected all these plans,up to and including at Camp David in 2000 and Taba in 2001,and kept the armed struggle going.From 1948 to 1967 the West Bank,historically Judea and Samaria was held by Jordan,the Gaza Strip was held by Egypt.There were no "occupied territories",no"settlements"or any of the other excuses used today to attack Israel.But there was also no peace.Palestinians and neighboring Arab countries continuously attacked Israel and worked for the destruction of Israel.There was no call for Palestinian independence or statehood even though it could have been done by Jordan with the stroke of a pen.A independent Palestinian Arab state will be when the Palestinian Arabs find leadership that is committed to peace with Israel.

The Arab population displaced by the 1948 war has been greatly exaggerated.The actual figure is no more than 500000. Even more important is the cause of that displacement.The 1948 war was declared against Israel by all of its Arab neighbors.The refugees left Israel at the urging of those Arab states. They were told to leave because their homeland was about to be liberated by Arab forces.Of course,we all know Israel survived.Who is morally and legally culpable for creating those refugees?I would suggest it is the Arab states,not Israel.Far from being mistreated,the Arab population in Israel and in the territories administered by Israel has been freer than the population in any Arab state.Arabs in Israel vote.They elect leaders to the Knesset.have their own political parties.have their own newspapers.They have full rights to citizenship.They are free to speak their minds.

[dalandau]

As the Israel Antiquities Authority begins construction work at the Mugrabi Gate in Jerusalem in order to make the area structurally sound and safe for visitors, Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh has called on Muslims "to defend the al-Aqsa Mosque." Hamas has also charged Israel with "demolishing parts of the Aqsa mosque" on its website.
Although the works are not taking place on the Temple Mount , the Hamas website accused "the Israeli occupation government of conspiring to finally destroy the Aqsa Mosque, the third holiest Muslim shrine world-wide, and to install the alleged Third Temple on its ruins."
"The Aqsa Mosque is in real danger and needs Muslim support to defend and spare it the rancorous Israeli conspiracies", Palestinian Chief Justice Tayseer al-Tamimi declared, calling on Muslim masses to assemble to "protect" the site.
And the Head of the Islamic Movement in Israel, Sheikh Raed Salah, claims to have "documents and photos" proving that "the demolition of the pathway and the two rooms under the Buraq Mosque will expose both the Aqsa Mosque and Buraq Mosque inside Al-Haram Al-Sharif (Noble Sanctuary) to extreme danger as Israeli settlers will easily access both of them," the Hamas website added on Tuesday.
Calls have been issued for Palestinians to "unite their guns in defense of al-Aqsa," while the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades have threatened terrorist attacks if the work continue.
Certainly, small, far-Right fringe groups exist within Israel that have set their sights on the mosque, and on rebuilding the Temple using physical force - but the State of Israel has devoted considerable resources of its security arms to keeping such extreme elements in check.
Why do Palestinian leaders continue to insist that the al-Aqsa mosque is "in danger?" The answer may lie in the shiny gold covering of the Dome of the Rock itself.
A history of false charges
Since the 1920s, Palestinian leaders have used the site as a rallying cry to wage war against the Jewish presence in Israel, and to try and gain support from Muslims abroad. The Palestinian prime minister today is continuing a 90-year tradition of incitement, which began with the Palestinian Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini.
Husseini, who is widely seen as the father of Palestinian nationalism, used the al-Nabi festival, which commemorates the defeat of the Crusaders, and conquest of Jerusalem by the Islamic general Sala'ah al-Din, to instigate anti-Jewish riots in April 1920, even before he became a mufti. His message was simple: Jews are the new Crusaders, and Islam must re-invade Jerusalem.
After being elected mufti (through dubious strong-arm tactics, according to some sources,) and becoming head of the Supreme Muslim Council, Haj Amin embarked on an ambitious project of restoring the al-Haram (Dome of the Rock) and the al-Sharif (al-Aqsa Mosque).
By doing so, Haj Amin hoped to draw the attention of millions of Muslims to the Palestinian cause, and to gain material and financial support so that he could fight the growing Zionist Jewish community in Israel.
Members of the Islamic Council traveled around Muslim countries in the 1920s to gain support, with one delegation to Mecca stating: "The Islamic Palestine Nation, which has been guarding al-Aqsa and (the) Holy Rock ever since 1300 years, declares to the Muslim world that the Holy Places are in great danger on account of the horrible Zionist aggressions."
Like clockwork
These missions resulted in a successful fund-raising drive, which led to the gold covering of the Dome of the Rock.
One British official in Mandatory Palestine noted at the time a "remarkable psychological change..." and a "stirring of a new feeling in the Muslims of this country" following the restoration.
Haj Amin also had photos with the Star of David superimposed on the Dome of the Rock distributed widely, in order to convince Muslims of a "Jewish plot" against the site.
In April 1929, Haj Amin helped stoke riots by issuing a Friday afternoon sermon at the al-Aqsa Mosque, reemphasizing the charge of a Jewish bid to take over the Islamic holy sites.
The incitement continued right through into the 1990s, when in 1997, Yasser Arafat declared: "I am ringing the bell of danger to warn against the Jewish plan to build the Temple of Solomon in the place where today stands Al Aqsa Mosque, after removing the mosque."
Similar incitement flooded the airwaves of the Palestinian Authority following Ariel Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount in September 2000, launching what has now become known as the al-Aqsa Intifada.
Like clockwork, warnings of an Israeli plot to destroy the mosque are issued by the Hamas government every few days, ensuring that the flames of unfounded paranoia and incitement against Israel remain lit.

The previous mufti of Jerusalem prior to 1920 was actually pro zionism

[dalandau]

Israel was even meant to fight for the land:

"...They [the Children of Israel] said to a prophet of theirs [Samuel]: 'Raise up for us a king, and we will fight in G-d's way.' He said 'Might it be that, if fighting is prescribed for you, you will not fight?' They said: 'Why should we not fight in G-d's way?' Yet, when fighting was prescribed for them, they turned their backs, except for a few of them..." [Qur'an, "The Cow", chapter 2:246, 247].

The Qur'an confirms the special link between the People and the Land of Israel. The Tanach repeats this constantly. The return of the Children of Israel to their land is also proclaimed by both books.

The Qur'an speaks of the final return of the reunited House of Israel, both the Jews (House of Judah) and the Ten Lost Tribes (House of Ephraim), to the Land of Israel:

"Pharoah sought to scare them out of the land [of Israel]; but We [Allah] drowned him, together with all who were with him. Then We said to the Israelites: 'Dwell in this land [the Land of Israel]. When the promise of the World to Come comes to pass, We shall assemble you all together" [Qur'an, "Night Journey", chapter 17:106 - which foresees the return of a "mixed multitude"].

This Qur'anic prophecy probably refers to Deuteronomy 30:4-5, where Moses predicts the final return of the united House of Israel (Judah and Ephraim) from the four ends of the earth to the Land of Israel.

The Prophet Jeremiah, developing this theme, says:

"And I will cause the captivity of Judah and the captivity of Israel to return, and will build them, as at the first, and will cleanse them from all their iniquity, whereby they have sinned against me, and it shall be to me a name of joy, a praise of honor before all the nations of the world, which shall hear all the good that I do unto them, and they shall fear and tremble for all the goodness and for all the prosperity that I shall procure unto it" [Tanach, Jeremiah, chapter 33:7-9].

The Prophet Zechariah, who lived in the Second Temple Period (after the return from the captivity of Babylon) said:

"Thus says the Lord of Hosts: Behold, I will save My people from the east country, and from the west country, and I will bring them and they shall dwell in the midst of Jerusalem, and they shall be My people, and I will be their G-d, in truth and righteousness" [Tanach, Zechariah, chapter 8:7-8].

The Qur'an forbids making a division between the prophets before or after the Exile (Qur'an, "The Cow", chapter 2:130,208, "The House of Imram", chapter 3:78), and before or after the Hegira. Furthermore, the Qur'an praises the Psalms of David, which are Songs of Zion. The Qur'an acknowledges David as God's viceroy and Judge on Earth [Qur'an, "Zad", chapter 38:16-19,25].

"We sent not any before thee except men to whom we revealed: Question the People of the Remembrance [Children fo Israel], if it should be that you do not know -- with the clear signs, and the Psalms, and We have sent down to thee Remembrance [Qur'an] that thou [Muslims] mayest make clear to mankind what was sent down to them [Israelites]" [Qur'an, "The Bee", chapter 16:45].

In his Psalms David speaks clearly of the return of the Children of Israel to the Land of Israel. Psalm 102 says:

"Thou (O Lord) shall arise, and Thou shall have mercy upon Zion, for the time to favor her, yea, the set time is come, for the servants took pleasure in her stones, and favor the dust thereof. So the nations shall fear the Name of the Lord, and the kings of the Earth his glory. When the Lord shall build Zion, He shall appear in His glory. He will regard the prayer of the torn, and not despise their prayer. This shall be written for the last generation..." [Tanach, Psalm 102:14-19 (the Hebrew text says "the last generation", not "generation to come" as it appears in most English translations)]. "The Lord does build Jerusalem, He gathered the outcasts of Israel" [Tanach, Psalm 147:2, 69:35].

Jeremiah transmits the Lord's commandment to the nations:

"Hear the word of the Lord, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say: "He that scatters Israel will gather him and keep him, as a Shepherd does his flock. For the Lord has redeemed Jacob...therefore they shall come and sing in the heights of Zion..." [Tanach, Jeremiah 31:10].

The Qur'an concurs with this commandment of the Lord by saying that it was "sent down to thee as a remembrance that thou mayest make clear to mankind what was sent down to them" as quoted above.

Making that clear to mankind as the Qur'an enjoins you to do, you ought to make that clear first to yourselves.

The return of the Children of Israel to the Land of Israel is in no way comparable to invasions such as the Norman attack on England or the Spanish assault on the Americas, as you were led to believe.

The prophets, including David, speak clearly. They show that the Land of Israel is an entity of its own, distinct from the present concepts of Dar-es-Salam and Dar-el-Harb. It is the Land of the Lord God of Israel [Tanach, Jeremiah 2:7; Ezekiel 36:5; 38:16; Joel 4:2; and others]. The words of the prophets have begun to be fulfilled in our time with the ingathering of the Children of Israel after a 2,000 year dispersion, destruction of Nazi Germany, birth of the State of Israel and repeated defeats of hostile neighbors in unjustified wars.

Israel's enemies often claim that the Jews are a cursed people who are not entitled to the Land of Israel. Does the presence of confused and sinful men and women among the People of Israel justify this hostility? Was the hostility of the ancient Philistines justified by King Saul's weakness and sins? Were the hostilities of the Arabs against the Jews and their building of the Second Temple Justified? The Qur'an and the Tanach say no [Qur'an, "The Cow" chapter 2:245-253; Tanach, Nechemia 4:1].

The Qur'an commands Muslims to forgive:

"God took compact with the Children of Israel...for their breaking their compact. We cursed them and made their hearts hard...and you will never cease to light upon some act of treachery on their part, except a few of them. Yet pardon them, and forgive. Surely God loves those who do good" [Qur'an, "The Table", chapter 5:15-17].

Should faults among the Children of Israel nullify God's plans and promises? God is the Almighty, All-Merciful, All-Compassionate, who can forgive and establish His promises.

As the Qur'an says:

"We sent against you [Israel] our servants [the Romans] to discountenance you, and to enter the Temple, as they [the Babylonians] entered it the first time, and to destroy utterly what they ascended to. Perchance your Lord will have mercy upon you, but if you return [to the Land of Israel], We shall return...[to you]" [Qur'an, "Night Journey", chapter 17:8].

God promised that He will forgive Israel at the time of its return:

"And I will bring Israel again to his habitation, and he shall feed on Carmel and Bashan [the biblical name for the Golan Heights], and his soul shall be satisfied upon Mount Ephraim [Samaria in the so-called 'West Bank'] and Gilead. In those days, and at that time, saith the Lord, the iniquity of Israel shall be sought for, and there shall be none, and the sins of Judah, and they shall not be found, for I will pardon them whom I reserve" [Tanach, Jeremiah 50:19, 20].

The Almighty will surely do what He has promised.

"The promise of God! God fails not His promise, but most men do not know" [Qur'an, "The Greeks", chapter 30:5, "Believers", chapter 23:76].

Some say that perhaps the Jews shall return, but there is no promise for them to establish a state, taking away Arab land. Muslims are forbidden to make friendships with those who expelled Muslims from their habitations [Qur'an, "The Woman Tested", chapter 60:9]. Can they prove that the Land of Israel was or is rightfully their land? The Muslims defeated the Byzantines and took it from them. Were the Byzantines entitled to this land? Were the Crusaders, whom the Muslims later defeated, entitled to it? Muslims, and even more so the Jewish People, were delivered into their hands. Do you really think that you became the proper heir of the Land of Israel because you took it from the Crusaders?

Were the Muslims not guardians and stewards until the rightful heirs (the Children of Israel) would return at the appointed time? The Land of Israel is assigned to the Children of Israel as an eternal inheritance (Tanach, Genesis, 17:8,21; Joel 4:3; Amos 9:15) notwithstanding the two foretold dispersions. The Qur'an acknowledges this, as we saw already.

[dalandau]

From the examples given above, the reader has already been shown part of the distortion that has occurred within mainstream Islam. Islams misinterpretation of history and it's current unjust anti-Semitism, it's position on Jihad and conduct toward other nations in general, and it's conduct to the citizens within their own nations; these examples all reveal the rot that has invaded Islam and covered the face of the true and original Islamic doctrines. What are these real doctrines then?
As intelligence analyst Bruce Brill and Arye Gallin (of Root and Branch Association) never tire of pointing out, true Islam accepts Jewish sovereignty over the land of Israel and respects Judaism as well. What if it were finally realized by all, and publicized by the media that true Islam demands of it faithful followers to actively support Jewish sovereignty in the land of Israel? Such a realization would bring instant peace. Fulfilling the real practices and observances of true Islam by devout Muslims under the leadership of truly devout leaders would make the Israeli- Palestinian conflict a non-issue.
Real Islam on suicide bombings…
"The slaughter of children to protect wicked regimes…
Certain scholars of Islam, do point out truths relating to peace with Israel and with Jews. Recently for instance, a council of Islamic scholars issued a statement condemning violence against Israelis.
"Allah will bless the nations… who condemn those parents, teachers and terrorist criminals who poison the minds of children with hatred and violence. " {They are referring to the sick twisted practice by certain Muslims who are willing and eager (mistakenly in the name of Allah) to send their children to death "through acts of fitnah" (apostasy and sedition}.
"The suicidal sacrifice and slaughter of these children are in no way shape or form a manifestation of Islam but rather are a tool used by wicked regimes, who take advantage of ignorant people and send them to their death, all with the goal of defending the regime and keeping it in power. This has nothing to do with Islam, nor any other religion for that matter."
Real Islam on the Zionist entity… "There is no such precedent or doctrine preventing the recognition of a Zionist state…" The cultural institute of the Italian Islamic community, is another example of true scholarship. Their conclusions sum up the words of a learned sheikh: Classical Islamic source do not support the so-called "Islamic anti-Zionism" preached by radical groups. The idea of making Islam a factor that prevents Arabs from recognizing the sovereign right of Jews over Palestine, is an artificial construct. There is no such reference nor precedent in classic Islamic sources. Islam-based Anti-Zionism is a modern convenience, a rewriting of history that helps to explain and justify otherwise illogical positions and unspeakably cruel acts.
Another voice of truth and logic in the area of Arab-Jewish relations is the voice of the greatest Islamic scholar of the 20 th century, Sheikh Mohammed al-Azhar. He openly preached peace and cooperation between Muslims and Jews. The fame of this Sheikh scholarship was that he was able to silence those who say 'peace with Israel is against Islam.' As shown in the paragraph above, true Islam and Judaism should have no problem living in peace and there should be no problem with the existence of this small Israeli State. Most of the Islam publicized and taught today has turned rotten by the infiltration of Fascist, communist and Nazi texts.
And yes it is the same mufti that travelled to berlin during ww2 and planed to build an extermination camp in Palestine with the NAZIS

Who was the Grand Mufti, Haj Muhammed Amin al-Husseini?
..>..>..>..>..>..>..> ..>
Grand Mufti with Hitler

..>..>..>..>..>..>..>..> Muhammed Amin al-Husseini [many spelling variations] was born in 1893 (or 1895), the son of the Mufti of Jerusalem and member of an esteemed, aristocratic family. The Husseinis were one of the richest and most powerful of all the rivalling clans in the Ottoman province known as the Judaean part of Palestine.

Amin al-Husseini studied religious law at al-Azhar University, Cairo, and attended the Istanbul School of Administration. In 1913 he went to Mecca on a pilgrimage, earning the honorary title of "Haj". He voluntarily joined the Ottoman Turkish army in World War I but returned to Jerusalem in 1917 and expediently switched sides to aid the victorious British. He acquired the reputation as a violent, fanatical anti-Zionist zealot and was jailed by the British for instigating a 1920 Arab attack against Jews who were praying at the Western Wall.

The first Palestine High Commissioner. Sir Herbert Samuel arrived in Palestine on July 1, 1920. He was a weak administrator who was too ready to compromise and appease the extremist, nationalistic Arab minority led by Haj Amin al-Husseini. When the existing Arab Mufti of Jerusalem (religious leader) died in 1921, Samuels was influenced by anti-Zionist British officials on his staff. He pardoned al-Husseini and, in January 1922, appointed him as the new Mufti, and even invented a new title of Grand Mufti. He was simultaneously made President of a newly created Supreme Muslim Council. Al-Husseini thereby became the religious and political leader of the Arabs.

The appointment of the young al-Husseini as Mufti was a seminal event. Prior to his rise to power, there were active Arab factions supporting cooperative development of Palestine involving Arabs and Jews. But al-Husseini would have none of that; he was devoted to driving Jews out of Palestine, without compromise, even if it set back the Arabs 1000 years.

William Ziff, in his book "The Rape of Palestine," summarizes:

Implicated in the [1920] disturbances was a political adventurer named Haj Amin al Husseini. Haj Amin, was sentenced by a British court to fifteen years hard labor. Conveniently allowed to escape by the police, he was a fugitive in Syria. Shortly after, the British then allowed him to return to Palestine where, despite the opposition of the muslim High Council who regarded him as a hoodlum, Haj Amin was appointed by the British High Commissioner as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem for life. [P. 22]
Al-Husseini represented newly emerging proponents of militant, Palestinian Arab nationalism, a previously unknown concept. Once he was in power, he began a campaign of terror and intimidation against anyone opposed to his rule and policies. He killed Jews at every opportunity, but also eliminated Arabs who did not support his campaign of violence. Husseini was not willing to negotiate or make any kind of compromise for the sake of peace.

As a young man, al-Husseini worked with a native Jew, Abbady, who documented this comment:

Remember, Abbady, this was and will remain an Arab land. We do not mind you natives of the country, but those alien invaders, the Zionists, will be massacred to the last man. We want no progress, no prosperity. Nothing but the sword will decide the fate of this country.
In 1929, major Arab riots were instigated against the Jews of Palestine. They began when al-Husseini falsely accused Jews of defiling and endangering local mosques, including al-Aqsa. The call went out to the Arab masses: "Izbah Al-Yahud!" — "Slaughter the Jews!" After the killing of Jews in Hebron, the Mufti disseminated photographs of slaughtered Jews with the claim that the dead were Arabs killed by Jews.

In April, 1936 six prominent Arab leaders formed the Arab Higher Committee, with the Grand Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini as head of the organization, joining forces to protest British support of Zionist progress in Palestine. In the same month, riots broke out in Jaffa commencing a three-year period of violence and civil strife in Palestine that is known as the Arab Revolt. The Arab Higher Committee led the campaign of terrorism against Jewish and British targets.

Using the turmoil of the Arab Revolt as cover, al-Husseini consolidated his control over the Palestinian Arabs with a campaign of murder against Jews and non-compliant Arabs, the recruitment of armed militias, and the raising of funds from around the Muslim world using anti-Jewish propaganda. In 1937 the Grand Mufti expressed his solidarity with Germany, asking the Nazi Third Reich to oppose establishment of a Jewish state, stop Jewish immigration to Palestine, and provide arms to the Arab population. Following an assassination attempt on the British Inspector-General of the Palestine Police Force and the murder by Arab extremists of Jews and moderate Arabs, the Arab Higher Committee was declared illegal by the British. The Grand Mufti lost his office of President of the Supreme muslim Council, his membership on the Waqf committee, and was forced into exile in Syria in 1937. The British deported the Arab mayor of Jerusalem along with other members of the Arab Higher Committee.

[dalandau]

According to documentation from the Nuremberg and Eichmann trials, the Nazi Germany SS helped finance al-Husseini's efforts in the 1936-39 revolt in Palestine. Adolf Eichmann actually visited Palestine and met with al-Husseini at that time and subsequently maintained regular contact with him later in Berlin.

In 1940, al-Husseini requested the Axis powers to acknowledge the Arab right:

... to settle the question of Jewish elements in Palestine and other Arab countries in accordance with the national and racial interests of the Arabs and along the lines similar to those used to solve the Jewish question in Germany and Italy.
While in Baghdad, Syria al-Husseini aided the pro-Nazi revolt of 1941. He then spent the rest of World War II as Hitler's special guest in Berlin, advocating the extermination of Jews in radio broadcasts back to the Middle East and recruiting Balkan Muslims for infamous SS "mountain divisions" that tried to wipe out Jewish communities throughout the region.

At the Nuremberg Trials, Eichmann's deputy Dieter Wisliceny (subsequently executed as a war criminal) testified:

The Mufti was one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jewry and had been a collaborator and adviser of Eichmann and Himmler in the execution of this plan. ... He was one of Eichmann's best friends and had constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard him say, accompanied by Eichmann, he had visited incognito the gas chamber of Auschwitz.
With the collapse of Nazi Germany in 1945, the Mufti moved to Egypt where he was received as a national hero. After the war al-Husseini was indicted by Yugoslavia for war crimes, but escaped prosecution. The Mufti was never tried because the Allies were afraid of the storm in the Arab world if the hero of Arab nationalism was treated as a war criminal.

From Egypt al-Husseini was among the sponsors of the 1948 war against the new State of Israel. Spurned by the Jordanian monarch, who gave the position of Grand Mufti of Jerusalem to someone else, Haj Amin al-Husseini arranged King Abdullah's assassination in 1951, while still living in exile in Egypt. King Tallal followed Abdullah as king of Jordan, and he refused to give permission to Amin al-Husseini to come into Jordanian Jerusalem. After one year, King Tallal was declared incompetent; the new King Hussein also refused to give al-Husseini permission to enter Jerusalem. King Hussein recognized that the former Grand Mufti would only stir up trouble and was a danger to peace in the region.

Haj Amin al-Husseini eventually died in exile in 1974. He never returned to Jerusalem after his 1937 departure. His place as leader of the radical, nationalist Palestinian Arabs was taken by his nephew Mohammed Abdel-Raouf Arafat As Qudwa al-Hussaeini, better known as Yasser Arafat. In August 2002, Arafat gave an interview in which he referred to "our hero al-Husseini" as a symbol of Palestinian Arab resistance.


Its all british incitement

Ziff's book (which was published first in l938 but probably took three or four years of research to write) documents how the British "created" the opposition to Zionism and that up until these so-called "radical Arab leaders" came into the picture, most Arab residents of Palestine wanted nothing more than to live in peace and prosperity with the Jews which they believed was their good fortune.

"The Moslem religious leaders, the Mufti, was openly friendly. Throughout Arabia, the chiefs were for the most part distinctly pro- Zionist: and in Palestine the peasantry were delighted at every prospect of Jewish settlement near their villages. Commercial intercourse between Arab and Jew was constant and steady." pp.13

"The Arab National Movement was hated by the huge Levantine population who continued to regard themselves simply as Ottoman subjects, looked to the strong, influential Zionist Organization for sympathy and assistance."

"Hussein of the Hejaz looked to the Zionists for the financial and scientific experience of which the projected Arab state would standly badly in need. In May 1918, Dr. Chaim Weizmann and Hussein of the Hejaz met in Cairo where the latter spoke of mutual cooperation between Jews and Arabs in Palestine. In early l9l9 a Treaty of Friendship was signed to provide for "the closest possible collaboration in the development of the Arab state and the coming Jewish Commonwealth of Palestine. On March 3, l9l9, another Arab leader, Feisal, son of Sherif, wrote: "We wish the Jews a most hearty welcome home."

If Ziff's words are accurate, there was no Arab opposition to Jewish immigration to Palestine at least as far back as l919.

[dalandau]

The Koran on Violence… The true spirit of Islam condemned barbarity and the spilling of innocent blood.. Leading expert on Islam Khaled Fouad Allam has written that the true sprit of the Koran condemns barbarity and the spilling of innocent blood. There is tremendous cultural impoverishment in today's Islam. The Muslim world is submerged in an intellectual night, but it's possible to emerge from. For example, if you dear readers could help in spreading this important information, that would help free so many from the darkness of their brainwashed isolation.
Powerhouse Russel Simmons testified that Minister L. Farrakhan the leader of The Nation of Islam (also known as Louis "the Charmer" Walcott), stated that "A Muslim cannot hate a Jew. We are all members of the family of Abraham and we should all maintain dialogue and mutual respect." Oil money and media hide all of these Muslim groups and their friendly attitudes. Did you know that over 76% of the Arabs living inside the borders of Israel, do not want to be there andwant to leave? They are tired and have no desire or energy for the artificial conflict created by their extremists. However, over 80% of the above groups do not want to move to a Muslim country but rather to a country with the same freedoms and democracy enjoyed in Israel.
Jewish sparks in early Islam

When Mohammed, his new wife Ayisha, her father, and convert Abu Bakr arrived in Yatharib (later named Medina ), they found the city ready for monotheism simply because Jews had developed the township. The Jews had openly taught the pagans the beauty of pure ethical monotheism. The hallmarks of early Islam were tolerance, and conciliation with the Jewish elders. Mohammed went so far as to bring a huge amount of Jewish thought, ritual, and tradition into Islam. Before Mohammed's mythical overnight ride to Jerusalem, before the victories over Medina and Mecca, he decreed that Muslims should pray toward Jerusalem. Although Mohammed admitted he never actually read Jewish tradition (because he couldn't read…), he did however have ample exposure to learned Jewish traders, scholars and elders. Using the ancient the ancient Judaic framework, he was able to build his own spiritual, theological edifice.

The 114 chapters of the Koran are profoundly influenced by both the Jewish oral and written tradition (the Bible and the Talmud). Doctor Abraham Geiger, around 170 years ago, already document this biblical influence on the Koran. More recently, Prof. A. Katz, Andre Zaqui, Rabbi Doctor Kolatch, and my own (less well-known) writings, show that the sermons of Mohammed borrow extensively from Jewish sources. An honest look at history will show that many Jews and Christians who had converted to Islam were among the copyists, scribes, editors and even scholars who helped canonize the Koran. The scholar Andre Zaqui even wonders how "surprising that the adherents of Islam did not collect the Bible and the Koran into one volume as did the Christians with the Bible and their New Testament.

Mohammed does confirm the data of biblical revelation and G-d's promises to His people Israel , but does not undertake some of the precepts of the Torah." Both Christianity and Islam (with minor adjustments), contain the seven universal commandments revealed to Noah in the rainbow ten generations before the first Hebrew, Abraham. Andre Zaqui continues to explain "Thus it is common knowledge that sages such as the Rambam (Maimonides, Hilchot M'lachim, 11,4) and Rabbi Yehuda Halevi (Kuzari, 23) {etc.} recognized Christianity and Islam as having originating (in large part) in Judaism, as religious movements 'essential for the redemption of mankind' in as much as they made possible the conversion of many people to the belief of one G-d as referred to in the Bible, also containing the prophetical principles of ethics."

The Prophet Micah as preserved and passed on by all the sages and scribes of Israel , proclaims in chapter 4-5: "Let all the peoples walk, each in the name of its god, but we shall walk in the name of the Lord our G-d forever." Thus, even in messianic times there could still be room for some disagreement concerning G-d, and the sages of Israel present a tolerant, legal decision regarding those yet to be resolved differences.

Who cares about some contradictions that exist between the Torah (Bible and Talmud) and the Koran? The whole point here is that it's ok to have some differences and it's up to all of G-d's creatures to emphasize the common denominator amongst themselves, and for heavens sakes get along with each other. "Come on people now, smile on your brother, everyone get together, try to love one another right now".

As Professor A. Katz has said, and with which the researcher Andre Zaqui agrees, is that "the solution lies in the many quotations from Midrash contained in the Koran, but direct or indirect knowledge of Jewish traditions does not prevent theological originality, literary richness and poetical format in the Koran. It follows from this that apart from the inspiration taken from Jewish sources, the literary nature of the Koran and the beauty of the Arabic language, grant the book its attractiveness and enticing originality. It can therefore be determined that if Mohammed came to confirm the Torah of Moses and to adjust it and update it for his Arab brethren in Mecca and Medina, then the Torah suffices as it is for the Children of Israel who accepted it 2000 years before the period of Mohammed, and likewise for the New Testament which confirmed the Torah of Moses and was written some 13 centuries after the Torah and 5 centuries before the time of Allah's Messenger.

It cannot therefore be stated sufficiently how great is the obligation of Islam to Judaism and the Jews who brought to the whole world the Book of Books, the prophecy, the Psalms, and the Song of songs. 'This obligation is so tremendous in its own right that it forces by its power, respect for the People of Israel', (in the words of the French historian, the late Jules Isaac).

"The above religions are based on the faith of their adherents in one G-d and on the spiritual and moral values by which they have always tried to live. Indeed, from the point of view of morals and the purest spirituality, only such an effort on the part of the spiritual leaders of the believers and their institutions can advance humanity on the divine and universal path of truth, brotherhood, justice and peace. In conclusion, we mention the rebuke of Jules Isaac: "At the present time, when hunger on the one hand, and nuclear threat on the other, are weighing down on the whole of humanity, the duty of pure heartedness and conciliation between the nations is urgent and obliges every one of us to thoughts of Auschwitz ."

As continues Andre Zaqui, "I have tried to show the similarity between the Torah and the Koran and to compare the principles of faith and religion between Judaism and Islam in their various developments and particularly to emphasize the borrowing of the Koran from the Torah and the tradition of Jewish sages.

[dalandau]

Apart from a number of concepts that are foreign to Judaism, (such for example the Jinns - the strong emphasis on demonology, the particulars of material life that believers enjoy in the Garden of Eden after their death, and the exaggerated apocalyptic… descriptions of… the Fire of Gehinnom)… many scholars note that the crucial points in the beliefs and opinions of Judaism and Islam are similar and near-identical. For example, the six pillars of Islam are: Belief in one G-d who is first and last, belief in the existence of angels, belief in the Scriptures and in the prophecy of the prophets, in the End of Days and the matter of good and evil and, finally, the five precepts of the religion and the rite the Muslims have to uphold: the proclamation of the testimony by every believer that there is no G-d but G-d, the precept of pilgrimage and the precept of fasting." (Andre C. Zaqui, Jewish Sources in the Koran, 1983). In short, for practical purposes, for everyday life in society, what is important is not so much what divides us, but rather what we have in common (which is sometimes so much more then we think) and what unites us!

Emir Fassil son of Sherif Hussein and recognized Arab leader, signed an agreement with Zionist leaders that basically acknowledged all that it is written above. They stated for instance,
"Mindful of the racial kinship and racial bonds existing between the Arabs and the Jewish people… the surest means of working out the consummation of their national aspiration is through the closest possible collaboration of the Arab state and Palestine ."
(" Palestine ", in this context referred to the part of the Near East to be given to and designated for a Jewish state in the 1919 Paris Peace Convention).

Emir Fassil and friends likewise agreed to the realization of the Balfour declaration as just and right, and in harmony with Islam. They agreed to and called for
"…All necessary measures... To encourage and stimulate immigration of Jews into Palestine on a large scale, and as quickly as possible to settle Jewish immigrants upon the land through closer settlement and extensive cultivation of the soil."
So what happened? Fanatic radical groups took possession of political leadership and inherited the oil fields, which the westerners had discovered. The meek may inherit the earth, but not its mineral rights. With scores of years of propaganda, brainwashing, political murders gave birth to the following; statements which are representative of current leadership as well. "This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the crusades." (Azzam Pasha, Secretary General of the Arab League, 1948. Where? Where else. Cairo of course.) Arafat, Abu Mazen. Mubarak, Anwar Sadat, Assad (The Lion of Syria), have all denied the Holocaust, but have wished that there had been (as seen when they applauded the above kind of statement.)
The above leaders and many others have embarked on a brave new path that calls for the annihilation of the Jewish entity by way of slices and stages and fake diplomatic negotiations and overtures. The pure deception of the plan of stages is so thoroughly against the demands of the Koran for thinking the truth, speaking the truth, acting the truth, and getting closer to the God of truth. There are, thank G-d, a growing number of Muslims who see the truth. For example, a fast-growing web-site: Arabsforisrael.com. There, Arabs and Muslims bravely express their pro-Israel views.
The Koran distorted and adulterated by foreign dogmas
Many true scholars of true Islam provides explanations at to over the years, during different periods, Islam has become adulterated by foreign dogmas. This has been to the detriment of Islam and is responsible for much of the carnage, violence and hatred that has been expressed in the name of "Islam." These adulterants include communism, fascism, Nazism, racism, intolerance, greed, and other such destructive forces.

Hazrat Mirza Hamud, for example, (who has over ten million followers), condemns without exception all forms of terrorism. These acts, he says, done in the name of ''Islam," are without exception simply murder. There is no such support for these acts in the original traditional, religious observance of true Islam. Many Koranic sources, he brings down, and can be found, to back up his statements. This is not the opinion of a single man and his followers, but rather a peaceful doctrine of which he reminds us.

He also writes at length on the influence of Marxist writings on Islam. As he and others point out, some modern Islamic writings are adulterated by (or even quote directly!), the Communist Manifesto. Unfortunately, there exist pseudo-Muslim spokesmen who without hesitation attribute these Marxist concepts to Mohammed. These distortions of Islam have stealthily infiltrated into Islam in general and created a cult of death.

Professor Hamud goes on to explain that Communist concepts are not the only teachings that are foreign to true Islam but have succeeded in worming their way in. The concept of heresy is another foreign and destructive doctrine. as punishable by man was never a tenet or practice of Islam. Two bizarre cults -Wannabe and Deobani have disfigured Islam by their incorporation of medieval positions on heresy. Orientalists who often criticize Islam, agree that there exists no such dogma of heresy in Islam, and that in this manner Islam cannot be compared to Christianity. As Bernard Louis held,
"What mattered in original Islam, as with Judaism, was what people did," (Orthopraxy not orthodoxy). Muslim warlords like Maulama Maudadi introduced Calvinist Christian ideas of heresy that were foreign to Islam. Eventually the foreign roots were forgotten and it became entwined into Islam as the accepted "rule of thumb.

Calvin's logic held "death as the punishment of apostasy", but the Koran says over and over that heresy is taken care of by God, and it is not in the realm of man to mete out punishment. In the Koran (76;30) it says "surely this is a reminder; so whoever wishes may take the way that leads to his God." The principle leader of the Muslim Council of Britain Abdul Jalil Sagid has condemned terror saying that no excuses can be used to justify it; it is a perversion of Islam, and represents outside, non-Muslim influences. Sagid wants an active policy of naming and shaming radicals. Thus we see that often it is not Islam distorting Biblical narratives, but rather Arab political chiefdoms that gave new interpretations. In the case of Isaac, Christianity, Bahai and other religions have the same version as the Jews. There are even ancient texts predating Islam that support the original Biblical versions.

Arab political military needs came together to intimidate Muslim scholars. Mohammad bin Hasan al Shaybani dedicated an entire book to Muslim military campaigns. He explains that though out the centuries, the politicians and the armies of Muslim states would press jurists to give rulings on the laws of combat etc., that were radicalized and distorted, but served their agendas. The army would tell the Muslim scholars "Give us this or that ruling, or the enemy will come for you and your dear books will go up in flames." Prison and torture was also an option for obstinate scholars. "Like all super powers, the Muslim state became intoxicated by its own strength." (Says the scholar Abou El Fadl). "The problem is that we have the books," says a Muslim Professor, "but they have the terror organizations."

[dalandau]

As far as Orthodox Judaism is concerned, the foundations of theology and politics are the same as the underpinnings of religion and philosophy – namely, mercy and tolerance. Judaism cries out for you my G-d are good and forgiving and abundantly kind to all who call upon You (Psalm 86-5.) "G-d is near to all who call upon Him, to all who call upon Him sincerely" (Psalm 145.) All good people have a share in the world-to-come (Talmud.) The very act of creation of this world is one of benevolence. The infinite eternal indivisible G-d of pure spirit, made room so to speak, for a finite, physical creation. This infinite, divine being, that is indescribable, so to speak hid or constricted his divine light to allow for a separate creation to exist. Our job is to imitate Him, "imitation of the divine qualities." ." "But you who cleave to the Lord your God, you are alive every one of you today" (Deuteronomy 4-4 and Sanhedrin 64a.) The sages ask,

"How is it possible to cleave to the Holy One G-d who is a devouring fire?" (Deuteronomy 4-24.) That means, so to speak, that the Divine is so far beyond us, is transcendent from us. The sages answer that by cleaving to the righteous scholars who can process or filter G-d's fire..light in a way that makes it accessible to everyone (Ketuvot 111b, Zohar I 51a.) Cleaving to G-d can also be accomplished by cleaving to His Torah; His love letter to humanity containing so to speak his wisdom and will. Finally, cleaving to God, means imitating his character traits personified for our understanding, behavior that He allows us to know through His interface with the finite world (Likutey Halachot, Heksher Keilim 4-5.) Therefore, just as He is merciful, so you must be merciful, just as He is kind, you are to be kind. Where he constricted himself, so to speak constricted His infinite presence so that worlds could come into being, so we too are to be humble and restrict ourselves, our egos and presence, to allow others to grow and be different from us.

For example, before and after the Exodus for Egypt , the ancient Hebrews were explained the Sabbath commandments. Here, they were instructed to allow their man and maid servant to rest like them. Why? Because they are like you, everyone is a creature of the One Creator. Slavery is only a socio-economic disadvantage and does not speak to the essential quality of the individual. For everyone's worth come from their being created in the image of the divine. Therefore, the Greeks and Romans legislated a death penalty for all Jews who would keep the Sabbath because it challenged their societies built on slavery.

Remember, the Greek democracy of free men consisted only of one percent of the population, 99% were in abject slavery. As Shimon Peres said (Former PM of Israel ), "The Sabbath commandment was the first call to humanity at large for real equality. And the first summons of freeing man from the bondage of man, for freeing man from him Himself, from the routine of work. This was the first significant taste of freedom and equality. And this taste has never faded since.



Like a game of cosmic hide-and-seek, the Divine has hid His light, and throughout the course of our lives it is our job to seek out that light, reveal it to ourselves and to others; in such a way His light is tolerant, benevolent and abundant in blessings for all. As the great Rabbi Akiva said, 'Love thy neighbor as thyself,' (Leviticus) is the fundamental principle of Judaism." As Hillel, one of the great Rabbis of the Talmud proclaimed, "Be of the disciples of Aharon, loving peace, pursuing peace, loving your fellow creations and drawing them closer to Torah."

Nazism Infects Islam
As Dr. Asher Ader of the Islam-Israel fellowship (Root and Branch- Aryeh Gallin) points out, in the twenties and thirties the Haji Amin el-Husseini kicked off bloody pogroms against innocent Jews. He proceeded to raise two Muslim SS divisions for the Nazis, and then cried out from Berlin Radio for Jihad against the Jews: "Kill them where ever you find them…" After his release by the French in 1945, he successfully spread a Nazi smear campaign in the Arab press. Hitler's writings became bestsellers and the Haji Amin el-Husseini forged Islam into a bigoted, anti-Semitic ideology, drenched in Nazism.

Many of the important key leaders in the Palestinian movements today have voiced their support for and belief in the Haji Amin el-Husseini, as well as publicly stating that their goals are to implement his goals. The same present day leadership goes as far as to claim to be spiritual relatives of Husseini. (They went against that old adage that you can pick your friends but not your relatives). The same Mufti Husseini demanded a reversal of the Hungarian governments plan to rescue Jewish children by sending them to the Holy Land . Through his continued pressure he succeeded in having the rescue plan aborted. Another 900 children were thus sent to extermination camps in Poland . (From the personal diary of the Mufti Husseini, cited by Joan Peters, from Time Immemorial ).

The Mufti's conduct reminds me of a section of a verse from the Prophet Ezekiel (35: 4-5). "You shed the blood of the children of Israel at the time of their calamity." Feisal Hussein was a blood relative of the Mufti, and also leader, spokesman and key player in the Palestinian leadership. He revealed that the entire Oslo process was a Trojan Horse tactic to destroy Israel . Like Hitler's invasion of the Sudetenland , if someone had called his bluff, he would have retreated. So modern day Hitler Wannabes bluff and huff and puff - and Israel does the retreating.

______________________________ _______________________

The destruction of the Temple Mount Antiquities


In 1967, Jerusalem once again became a united city under Israel's sovereignty. The Old City section fell under Israeli administration. Since then, every Israeli President and Prime Minister has proclaimed the ever-lasting devotion of the Israeli people and government to the holiest place, revered by Jews, Christians and Moslems.

For over 30 years Israel has in fact delegated almost all authority over the Temple Mount to the Islamic Clerics. By doing this, Israel showed her commitment to respect the rights of the Muslims.

Now, as incredible as it seems, the Islamic Clerics deny any non-Moslem connection to the site. The Moslems also prevent archaeologists from investigating the site, one of the world's most prominent ancient treasures.

Israel has accepted its present inability to actively explore the Temple Mount. However, It is one thing to prevent exploration, and quite another to bulldoze through ancient structures without any archeological supervision.

In 1996 the Islamic Clerics changed the accepted status quo that was kept for generations and converted two ancient underground Second Temple Period structures into a new large mosque. Both structures, known as Solomon's stables and the Eastern Hulda Gate passageway, were never mosques before. The new mosque extends over an area of 1.5 acres, thus being the largest mosque in Israel, able to accommodate 10,000 people.

In November 1999, the Islamic Clerics opened what they called an "emergency exit" to the new mosque. Over 3 days and nights the exit has expanded into a gaping hole, 18,000 square feet in size, and up to 36 feet deep. Thousands of tons of the ancient fills from the site, subsequently found by Israeli archeologists to contain artifacts dating as early as the First Temple Period, were dumped into the Kidron Valley.

Since the creation of the gaping hole and up until now, without any archaeological supervision, thousands of square-meters of the ancient surface level of the Temple Mount are dug up by tractors, paved and announced as open mosques.

Moreover, in 1997 another ancient underground Second Temple Period structure, known as the Western Hulda Gate passageway, has been converted into another new mosque. Recently, in February and March of 2001, an ancient arched structure built against the Eastern Wall of the Temple Mount enclosure was razed by bulldozers in order to enlarge further the "emergency gate" of the new mosque at the Stables of Solomon.
And since then even more distruction has happend!!!!!

[dalandau]

IMAM PALAZZI.

L'islam contemporain vit une tragédie. Il a été kidnappé par une hérésie née voici trois siècles dans le désert du Nejd, le wahhabisme, aujourd'hui au pouvoir en Arabie Saoudite, et par ses nombreuses variantes, des Frères musulmans (al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun) aux confréries dites "islamistes". L'islam connaît sans doute actuellement un essor numérique et géographique. Mais il subit en même temps une profonde décadence interne, au moins dans son c ur historique : le monde arabe et les autres pays du Proche et du Moyen-Orient. Son salut viendra peut-être de la périphérie : des islams d'Afrique ou d'Extrême-Orient, ou d'un nouvel islam en gestation dans les pays pluralistes et multiculturels d'Occident, en Europe et en Amérique.

En quoi le wahhabisme et l'islamisme sont-ils hérétiques ?

Lors de leur apparition, les wahhabites ont été rejetés avec horreur par la quasi-totalité des autorités musulmanes, et combattus par les pouvoirs musulmans légitimes, notamment le sultan-calife ottoman. En raison de leur doctrine : ils rejetaient la Sunna, la tradition séculaire de l'islam, au profit d'une lecture littéraliste du Coran. Et en raison de leurs actes : ils se livraient, sous couvert de religion, aux pires excès, du saccage des Lieux Saints, notamment à La Mecque et Médine, au massacre de populations musulmanes entières, femmes et enfants compris. Ce rejet du wahhabisme a persisté jusqu'à notre époque, tant qu'il s'est trouvé des chefs religieux capables de s'exprimer à ce sujet. Les clones modernes du wahhabisme, qu'il s'agisse des Frères musulmans, du néo-wahhabiste Oussama Ben Laden, des taliban, ou des autres réseaux dits islamistes ne se différencient du wahhabisme proprement dit qu'en formulant un projet politique de domination mondiale, analogue sur bien des points au fascisme et au communisme, et en mettant en place, comme leurs modèles totalitaires européens, des réseaux hiérarchisés de militants professionnels.

Comment expliquer que ces hérétiques aient pris le pouvoir dans une partie importante du monde musulman ?

Ils se sont imposés par la force et la terreur : soit en renversant les pouvoirs musulmans établis, soit en les faisant chanter. Au fur et à mesure qu'ils consolidaient leur emprise sur des pays musulmans, leurs ressources financières s'accroissaient, et donc leur capacité de subvertir d'autres pays ou communautés. Je dois ajouter que les Occidentaux portent également leur part de responsabilité. Ignorants en matière islamique, les Britanniques et plus tard les Américains ont cru que les wahhabites et les islamistes n'étaient que des musulmans conservateurs, " intégristes ", et les ont soutenus avec l'idée de s'appuyer sur eux en retour. En 1991, l'Amérique a fait la guerre du Golfe pour sauver l'indépendance du Koweit et à plus long terme celle de l'Arabie Saoudite. L'émir du Koweit les a remerciés en accordant un énorme soutien financier au mouvement islamiste et terroriste Hamas, puis en participant à la création, à Lugano, du Nada Management Group, c'est-à-dire du holding de Ben Laden. J'espère que les événements du 11 septembre ont ouvert les yeux des dirigeants de Washington.

Où peut-on encore trouver des musulmans orthodoxes ?

Dans la plupart des pays arabes, l'islam sunnite orthodoxe a été remplacé par un mélange instable d'islamisme et de nationalisme arabe non-religieux. Dans d'autres pays, comme le Pakistan, il a été marginalisé par le wahhabisme. En ce XVe siècle de l'Hégire, il survit surtout dans des pays périphériques, en Afrique noire, en Inde, en Indonésie, en Malaisie, dans l'ancienne Asie centrale soviétique. Le critère, c'est l'affiliation des Docteurs de la Loi coranique, des oulémas. Là où les wahhabites et les islamistes sont l'exception plutôt que la règle, l'islam est encore authentique. Là où ils sont la règle plutôt que l'exception, l'hérésie a gagné.
Une bataille cruciale est en train de se dérouler à cet égard. Elle concerne les matrices intellectuelles de l'islam, les séminaires théologiques. Dans le monde arabe, en Europe et en Amérique du Nord, ils sont aujourd'hui financés et donc actuellement contrôlés par les Saoudiens d'abord, par les Frères musulmans ou d'autres confréries islamistes ensuite. Avec toutes les conséquences que cela implique à moyen ou à long terme.

[dalandau]

La guerre sainte est-elle la finalité de l'islam ?

La "guerre sainte", comme vous dites, n'est pas un concept musulman, mais chrétien, dont les Croisades ont été l'application la plus célèbre. L'islam parle seulement de "djihad", c'est-à-dire d'effort vers le bien. La littérature islamique classique range dans cette catégorie des actes aussi différents que le pèlerinage à La Mecque pour les femmes, la nécessité de prendre soin de ses parents âgés ou le perfectionnement éthique. C'est seulement par extension que le "djihad" recouvre également la guerre juste. Mais cette guerre, à son tour, n'est pas nécessairement menée dans le seul intérêt des musulmans : selon le Coran, elle peut être décrétée "pour protéger les mosquées, les synagogues, les églises et les monastères", ou même en vue de repousser un envahisseur, même musulman. Dans le langage politique d'aujourd'hui, elle peut parfaitement s'appliquer à une guerre menée pour la défense des droits de l'homme.

Un musulman peut-il accepter l'existence d'Israël ?

Rien, dans l'islam sunnite orthodoxe, ne s'oppose à l'existence de cet Etat. En tout cas, rien dans la période actuelle, qui a commencé avec la disparition du sultanat-califat ottoman et qui ne s'achèvera que lors de l'arrivée de l'Imam al-Mahdi, c'est-à-dire du Messie.
En 1919, l'émir Fayçal, chef de la famille hachémite, docteur de la Loi et musulman pieux, avait approuvé la déclaration Balfour, signé un pacte d'amitié avec l'Organisation sioniste, et félicité les immigrants juifs pour leur "retour" dans la patrie de leurs ancêtres. Ce sont les Britanniques qui ont créé de toutes pièces un conflit judéo-musulman, en trahissant Fayçal et en favorisant sottement à sa place le soi-disant mufti de Jérusalem, Amin El-Husseini, qui n'était en fait qu'un agitateur nationaliste irréligieux, et qui a fini par passer du côté des Italiens et des Allemands. Par la suite, la cause dite palestinienne a été manipulée par tous les ennemis de l'islam : les régimes arabes irréligieux ou hérétiques, le communisme athée, etc.
L'idée selon laquelle les musulmans auraient un devoir particulier envers la "Palestine arabe" n'est pas plus fondée. D'abord parce que la notion même de "Palestine" est étrangère à la littérature islamique orthodoxe, qui ne connaît que le Bilad as-Sham, une entité comprenant les Etats actuels du Liban, de Syrie, d'Israël et de Jordanie. Et ensuite parce qu'un pays, arabe ou non, n'a pas d'existence en soi: ce n'est qu'une circonscription territoriale et politique, établie dans l'intérêt de ses habitants, pour l'administration de la justice et du bien. Dans la mesure du possible, un musulman souhaitera que cette circonscription soit dirigée par des musulmans pieux. Mais entre un pouvoir non-musulman juste et respectueux de l'islam, et un pouvoir musulman hérétique, injuste et oppresseur, il doit préférer le premier. A supposer qu'une obligation de remplacer l'Etat juif par un Etat palestinien musulman soit actuellement en vigueur, la même obligation serait valable a fortiori pour la Syrie, puisqu'elle est dirigée par des alaouites, considérés par les sunnites comme des renégats polythéistes, donc bien plus infidèles que les juifs monothéistes...

La démocratie est-elle compatible avec l'islam orthodoxe ?

Depuis la dissolution du califat, les musulmans ont le devoir, autant que possible, de vivre dans un Etat qui ne pratique pas l'oppression, assure la justice et protège l'islam et les autres religions révélées. La démocratie occidentale est actuellement le régime qui se rapproche le plus de cette définition. Des régimes à la fois démocratiques et musulmans fonctionnent déjà dans certains pays. Je constate que les droits politiques, sociaux et religieux des non-musulmans, Indiens hindouistes et Chinois bouddhistes, sont parfaitement garantis dans la Malaisie musulmane, par exemple, alors que dans mon propre pays, l'Italie, les droits des musulmans sont toujours définis par une loi restrictive de 1929, édictée par Mussolini, aux termes desquels l'islam, le bouddhisme et le christianisme orthodoxe ne sont que des "cultes autorisés", c'est-à-dire tolérés.
Un musulman vivant dans un pays démocratique doit accepter la loi civile tant qu'elle ne le contraint pas à violer la loi religieuse, la Charia. Par exemple, il peut se résigner à une loi autorisant l'homosexualité ou d'autres comportements sexuels interdits par le Coran tant qu'il ne sera pas lui-même contraint de les pratiquer. En sens inverse, il doit renoncer à des pratiques permises par la Charia mais interdites par le gouvernement démocratique, comme la polygamie. Je ne pense pas que la situation soit tellement différente pour les fidèles d'autres religions, notamment les
catholiques et les juifs.

Les gouvernements occidentaux doivent-ils jouer un rôle dans la désignation des chefs religieux musulmans ?


Qui est Shaykh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi,

Après exécution de son éducation séculaire et religieuse à Rome et au Caire en 1987, il est devenu l'Imam de la Communauté islamique italienne. En plus de nombreuses maîtrises, prof. Palazzi tient un Ph.D. en sciences islamiques par le décret du grand muftis du royaume de l'Arabie Saoudite.
Il a été nommé un membre du conseil d'administration de l'association musulmane italienne en 1989, et après a été élu son sécrétaire général.
Depuis 1991, il est le directeur de l'institut culturel de la Communauté islamique italienne voir www.amislam.com